B, G, F, M, N, H are concyclic. Let R be the radius of the circumscribing circle. MG = 2R sin ∠MBG and HN = 2R sin ∠NBH But ∠MBG = ∠NBH So MG = HN subtend equal angles at N, G respectively Hence GH ∥ MN
MGHN is a cyclic quadrilateral with the pair of opposite sides MG and NH of equal length. Triangles GHM and HGN are congruent by S.A.S property (since MG = HN, GH is common and ∠GHM = ∠GBM = ∠NBH = ∠NGH) So ∠MGH = ∠NHG But ∠MGH and ∠MNH are supplementary Hence ∠NHG and ∠MNH are supplementary which implies GH ∥ MN
Due to cyclic quadrilaterals made from right angles, (<GHF=<GBF)+(<FNM=<FBM)=<GBM Because of isosceles triangles and cyclic condition of BHNF, <GBM=<NBH=<NFH Left with <GHF+<FNM=<NFH from transitivity, if HF cuts MN at P then <FPN=<NFH-<FNM=<GHF and we are done
B, G, F, M, N, H are concyclic.
ReplyDeleteLet R be the radius of the circumscribing circle.
MG = 2R sin ∠MBG and HN = 2R sin ∠NBH
But ∠MBG = ∠NBH
So MG = HN subtend equal angles at N, G respectively
Hence GH ∥ MN
MG= HN is not enough to show that GH//MN
ReplyDelete. please provide additional details to show that GH//MN
MGHN is a cyclic quadrilateral with the pair of
ReplyDeleteopposite sides MG and NH of equal length.
Triangles GHM and HGN are congruent by S.A.S property
(since MG = HN, GH is common and ∠GHM = ∠GBM = ∠NBH = ∠NGH)
So ∠MGH = ∠NHG
But ∠MGH and ∠MNH are supplementary
Hence ∠NHG and ∠MNH are supplementary which implies GH ∥ MN
Due to cyclic quadrilaterals made from right angles, (<GHF=<GBF)+(<FNM=<FBM)=<GBM
ReplyDeleteBecause of isosceles triangles and cyclic condition of BHNF, <GBM=<NBH=<NFH
Left with <GHF+<FNM=<NFH from transitivity, if HF cuts MN at P then <FPN=<NFH-<FNM=<GHF and we are done